Works Cited

Becker, C. (2018). Metaphors we work by: Reframing digital objects, significant properties, and the design of digital preservation systems. Archivaria, 85, 6-37. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/694332

Duff, W. M., & Harris, V. (2002). Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science, 2(3-4), 263-285. 10.1007/BF02435625

Foscarini, F. (2017). Archival appraisal in four paradigms. In T. Eastwood & H. MacNeil (Eds.), Currents of archival thinking (2nd ed.) (pp. 109-133). Libraries Unlimited.

Greene, M., & Meissner, D. (2005). More product, less process: Pragmatically revamping traditional processing approaches to deal with late 20th century collections. American Archivist, 68, 208-263. 10.17723/aarc.68.2.c741823776k65863

King, O. C. (2024). Archival meta-metadata: Revision history and positionality of finding aids. Archival Science,  24, 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-024-09443-z

McCausland, S. (2017). Archival public programming. In T. Eastwood & H. MacNeil (Eds.), Currents of archival thinking (2nd ed.) (pp. 225-244). Libraries Unlimited.

Smith, M., & Villata, J. (2020). Applying user centered design to archives. Archives and Manuscripts, 48(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2020.1798790

Wakimoto, D. K., Bruce, C., & Partridge, H. (2013). Archivist as activist: Lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science, 13(4), 293-316. 10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1

Additional References:

Detroit Historical Society - https://www.detroithistorical.org/learn/online-research/encyclopedia-of-detroit/heidelberg-project

University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library (John and Leni Sinclair) - https://findingaids.lib.umich.edu/catalog/umich-bhl-850